CORE, ALIGNMENTS
and PERIPHERALS
MATRIX PATTERNS
Ben Bayer
Adelaide, Australia
Abstract.
This paper further explores the Matrix potential for examining word/meaning
relationships so essential to effective communication and to all related
thinking processes. The Matrix, a conceptual framework which integrates
the four elements feel/think/act/time into a single holistic landscape
of values and entities, provides the normative all inclusive background
against which these further special relationships can be displayed and
the relationship validity demonstrated.
The Core (Block 5)
at the centre of the Matrix offers 10 dominant paradigms but it is soon
apparent that, owing to the dynamic nature of the Matrix landscape, the
Cultural Block 8 which includes design, values and opportunity is, in ordinal
terms, a natural positive extension to Block 5. In this sense, the two
Blocks in combination can be considered the progressive dynamic core of
the Matrix. Four interesting paradigms in the extended Core are Balance
(55.0), Comprehension (55.00), Light (88.0) and Truth (88.00).
Examples of entities
in vertical, horizontal and diagonal alignments are given to highlight
the potential of paradigms combining as radicals and fractals to identify
new entities, with the demands of coherence validated by perception. Intelligence
(55.585) as a horizontal alignment may prove a stimulus for thoughtful
discussion. Examples of non-aligned peripherals are given highlighting
emphasis on their fractals chasing the periphery away from the extended
core, with tensorial forces at play to determine which way the cycle will
resolve. Option of last resort (53.192) is an example currently re-emerging
in the adversarial political lexicon.
Visual displays offer
a very valuable methodology for presenting ideas and concepts which can
influence ways of thinking. They operate in line with the well established
notion that seeing is believing, adding that exposure will always give
common sense a better chance to prevail. Apart from visual displays for
the main title, a number of supportive displays are given illustrating
the pattern configuration of Matrix projections and their ability to identify
and separate values by polarity, thereby enhancing and promoting positive
choices.
1. Introduction
This paper moves one step further in exploring the Matrix potential for examining word/meaning relationships so essential to effective communication and to all related thinking processes.2. The holistic frameworkThe structural linkages between Core, Alignments and Periphery are analysed, recognising the important impact of polarity on all facets of the Matrix landscape. Examples of typical or dominant entities in these groupings are given and can be seen as visual displays, taking advantage of the well established notion that “seeing is believing”.
Additional visual displays are included to further demonstrate the useful and coherent power of separation between and within various key entities when projected on the Matrix landscape.
The Matrix provides the conceptual framework within which all concepts and entities are projected. It is a framework which integrates the four elements feel/think/act/time into a single holistic landscape of values and entities, allowing visualisation of conceptual notions and relationships graphically and numerically. Of modular construct with decimal continuity, it forms a universal framework accommodating conceptual totality and functional flexibility.3. The CoreA 4-page Matrix Statement giving details of the Matrix construction, its rationale and a number of associated corollaries is readily available. It can be downloaded from the Internet, Web site http://www.ozemail.com.au/~bayerben/
2.1 Matrix expressions
They are numerical codes allocated to concepts and entities, in accordance with perception, to achieve the best fit on the Matrix landscape.
The decimal point in the expression separates the “Radical” on its left which is the selected starting position, from the “Fractal” on its right which is the decimal emphasis representing the direction of change.
For example, leadership (59.86) and consensus (59.75) share the radical 59 (choice/optimisation) but differ in the decimal emphasis, 86 (design) and 75 (reason) respectively.
The determination of a Matrix expression relating to an entity gets its validation from tests of perception (25.45), equivalence (55.383/55.386) and coherence (49.55). For this reason, the Matrix expressions presented in this paper should be considered as a first draft, open to and inviting debate.
The core locates in the centre of the Matrix as Block 5, connecting orthogonally and diagonally with the other 8 Blocks around it.4. AlignmentsThe dynamic nature of the Matrix landscape, with the directional flow of time permeating all elements, projects Block 8 as the natural positive extension to Block 5. In this sense, the two Blocks in combination can be considered the progressive dynamic core of the Matrix.
Further more, as 5/8 elements can be found everywhere in all the Matrix zones, core effects can be initiated anywhere and accelerated to full momentum through the dynamic core role of Blocks 5 and 8.
3.1 Dominant Core Paradigms (visual display 1)
The Matrix expression for paradigms is a radical with zero fractal.
51.0
52.0
53.0
54.0
55.0
55.00
65.0
57.0
58.0
59.0Regression
Observation
Interpretation
Retention
Balance
Comprehension
Attitude
Partnership
Right
Optimisation81.0
82.0
83.0
84.0
85.0
86.0
87.0
88.0
88.00
89.0Myth
Search
Complexity
Information
Opportunity
Design
Belonging
Light
Truth
ValuesFour interesting paradigms in the dynamic core are Balance (55.0) , Comprehension (55.00), Light (88.0) and Truth (88.00). The second zero in the fractal adds an element of inner depth.
4.1 Verticals (visual display 2)5. The Peripherals (visual display 5)They project as vertical shifts of location upwards or downwards within or between Tiers. Vertical alignments extend from left to right across the full spectrum of the Matrix.
e.g. 11.13
23.33
15.35
27.29
53.42pain
fanatic
vigilance
conclusion
pressure (-)46.64
47.57
71.81
76.94
87.99effort
friend
wishful thinking
contribution
global4.2 Horizontals (visual display 3)
They project as horizontal shifts of location to the left or to the right within or between Stages. Horizontal alignments extend from bottom to top along the full spectrum of the Matrix.
e.g. 47.74
42.12
46.76
57.87
55.585friendship
deprived
encourage
bridging
intelligence56.23
53.59
64.94
65.95
63.33disorder
challenge
expansion
growth
battle4.3 Diagonals (visual display 4)
They project as diagonal shifts of location upwards or downwards, to the right or to the left. They cover the full spectrum of the Matrix.
e.g. To the left To the right 53.33
52.32
51.31
27.23
25.23
56.12
51.11sustained (-)
discriminate
delay
false assumption
illogical
renounce
withdraw65.69
64.68
55.59
58.98
75.79
55.57
55.75
85.87
73.75
75.77effective
methodology
choice
righteous
enjoyment
understand
common sense
way of life
fun
patience4.4 Alignments review.
The above examples of entities in vertical, horizontal and diagonal alignments highlight the orderly potential of paradigms combining as radical and fractals to identify new key entities with the demands of coherence validated by perception.
The relationship Core and Periphery is somewhat analogous to centre and circle, but with the core less sharply defined than a centre and the periphery more fuzzy than a circle.The Periphery would therefore appear to locate in any of the 8 Blocks surrounding Block 5, including Block 8. In terms of alignments as defined in Section 4, the peripherals are non-aligned.
e.g. 45.113
21.513
21.522
21.323
23.323
23.523
13.533
33.533
32.53
66.53
56.969
47.79
48.83
32.983
73.87unacceptable
fear
uncertainty
panic
disloyal
misguided
revenge
crime
cheat
rivalry
purpose
pleasure
captivate
grand standing
entertainment53.192
26.92
63.92
86.93
43.793
87.93
58.96
57.596
68.96
56.896
89.96
45.97
66.98
86.98
86.99option of last resort
ambiguous
knife edge
cutting edge
seduction
populist
strategy
proactive
competence
perseverance
aspirations
satisfaction
authority
artistic
concept
The above examples of non-aligned peripherals highlight the tendency of their fractals to chase the periphery, away from the extended core. The tensorial forces at play, not excluding any other external forces, determine which way the cycle will eventually resolve.6. The arrow of timeReferring to the interactive cycle ABCD1D2E (Antecedents / Behaviour / Consequences / Dividends / Directions / Execution), the Periphery could locate in any of these elements except Behaviour. With Antecedents, it would refer to the Periphery resulting from a previous cycle.
Option of last resort (53.192) is an example currently re-emerging in the adversarial political lexicon.
One element of basic import when considering equivalence is the direction (or arrow) of time. For instance regression (51.0) refers to a perception of moving back in time while elsewhere the time flows on.7. Visual DisplaysPolarity, the notion of perceived positive and negative, is obviously linked (among other factors) to the direction of time flow. The more complicated the situation, the higher the potential for controversy about the sign of polarity in that particular situation..
1. Dominant Core Paradigms8. Conclusion
2. Vertical Alignments
3. Horizontal Alignments
4. Diagonal Alignments
5. Peripherals
6. The Broad Divisions
7. Achievement determinants
8. Behaviour determinants
9. Energy: the Vertical thrust
10. Intelligence: the Horizontal pull
11. Interactive social groups
12. From Perception to Choice
13. Information handling
14. Tooling up benefits
15. Approval v/s Disapproval
16. Priorities
17. Three golden Beliefs
18. Real v/s Virtual
19. Misguided passion
20. Reality, Potential, Propensity
21. Vision, Ideology, Metricity
22. Partnership
23. May and Can
24. Fear / Failure v/s Hope / Success
The 20 paradigms of the extended core appear to capture the fundamental essentials of all human interactions, the core extension reflecting by intent a positive bias. The negatives are not excluded from awareness, only from social concensus approval, adding responsibility to individual choices.9. ReferencesThe examples given for vertical, horizontal and diagonal alignments and for peripherals highlight the Matrix potential in useful analytical separation of key entities into component entities within a coherent holistic framework, facilitating comparisons within and between entities. Intelligence (55.585) in the horizontal alignments may prove a stimulus for thoughtful discussion.
The visual displays provided also facilitate open debate about universal values at the value level. The very wide acceptance of value levels confirms that polarity is a fact of life. Thinking must be encouraged into rejecting regressive modes and engaging in progressive pathways. This is not a new thought but well worth remembering at the start of the new Millennium.
The following short selection stands for both acknowledgement and reference:
1. Stephen Hawking: A brief history of time (1989)
2. Paul Davies: The mind of God (1992)
3. Edward de Bono: Simplicity (1998)